用户工具

站点工具


compare

差别

这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。

到此差别页面的链接

后一修订版
前一修订版
compare [2023/03/05 15:08] – 创建 空白不灭compare [2024/03/11 12:57] (当前版本) limesty
行 1: 行 1:
-比较+====== 三种差异量数的比较 (The differences of three measures of variability) ====== 
 + 
 +1. 极端分数:全距受影响最大,四分位距受影响最小。\\ 
 +There are extreme scores in the data set: the full range is the most affected, and the quartile is the least affected. 
 + 
 +2. 样本大小:全距可能随n增加而增加,四分位距和标准差不会。\\ 
 +Change the sample size: the full distance may increase with the increase of n, but the quartile distance and standard deviation will not. 
 + 
 +3. 样本选取:同一总体多次选取不同样本,全距没有稳定的值,但四分位距和标准差是稳定的。\\ 
 +Select different samples: the same population selects different samples many times, the full distance has no stable value, but the quartile distance and standard deviation are stable. 
 + 
 +4. 当存在不确定值的分布时,全距和标准差无法求得,四分位距可求。\\ 
 +When there is a distribution of uncertain values, the full distance and standard deviation can not be obtained, and the quartile distance can be obtained. 
 + 
 +====== 差异量数的优缺点 (Pros and cons of measures of variability) ====== 
 +^  ^  优点 (Pros)  ^  缺点 (Cons) 
 +|  全距 (Range)  | 1. 计算便捷  | 1. 样本稳定性差 \\ 2. 受极端数值的影响 \\ 3. 可能与样本量有关 
 +|  四分差 (Interquartile range)  | 1. 不易受极端分数的影响 \\ 2. 适用于有不确定值的数据  | 1. 在一定程度上样本稳定性差 
 +|  标准差 (Standard deviation)  | 1. 样本稳定性好 \\ 2.包含最多的信息  | 1.受极端数值的影响 
 + 
 +^  ^  Pros  ^  Cons  ^ 
 +|  Range  | 1. Easy to Calculate  | 1. Poor sample stability \\ 2. Influenced by extreme values \\ 3. Possibly related to sample size  | 
 +|  Interquartile range  | 1. Less susceptible to extreme values \\ 2. Suitable for data with uncertain values  | 1. Poor sample stability to some extent 
 +|  Standard deviation  | 1. Good sample stability \\ 2. Contains the most information  | 1. Influenced by extreme values  |
compare.1678028920.txt.gz · 最后更改: 2023/03/05 15:08 由 空白不灭